Archived Story

Public can comment on bridge

Published 11:09am Saturday, July 26, 2014

COURTLAND—Before issuing a permit to create a new bridge over the Nottoway River in Courtland, the Army Corps of Engineers has established a public comment period.

People have until the close of business on Monday, Aug. 25, to submit their thoughts on the project, and these need to be made in writing, and addressed to the Norfolk District, Corps of Engineers (ATTN: CENAO-WR-R), 803 Front St., Norfolk, VA 23510-1096.

Any comments received will be used to decide if a public hearing is necessary, and also to gauge the public’s interest in the project. To request such a forum, write to the district commander at the address above within 30 days.

Waterfront Marine in Virginia Beach was recommended by the Virginia Department of Transportation and won the bid last October. John W. Greene, senior vice president of Waterfront Marine, said last year that the firm would do the job is $9,476,000.

In addition, the company must also get permits from both the Courtland Wetlands Board and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality.

An estimated 0.58 acres of wetland are anticipated to be permanently impacted, and 0.75 acres will be temporarily affected by the construction. Wetland mitigation bank credits were bought that will compensate for both effects.

The replacement is required because the 85-year-old Darden Memorial Bridge was judged “structurally deficient and weight restricted” by VDOT. For example, in the summer of 2012, weight limits were lowered to the minimum possible for truck traffic.

In February 2013, the Southampton County Board of Supervisors had voted 6-1 to proceed with the project. Dr. Alan Edwards, supervisor for the Jerusalem District, was the dissenting voice in that vote. He represents the area where the bridge is located.

At the time, Edwards said he didn’t vote against the project, but believed that VDOT should have found money for an alternate that would have enabled the bridge to remain open during the building of a new one.

Once work is started, the bridge and connecting Meherrin Road are expected to be closed 12 to 16 months. This will mean a detour of seven miles using Route 58 and Business 58.

If you have any questions about this project or the permit process, contact Stephen Decker at Stephen.j.decker@usace.army.mil or 757-201-7832.

  • DIESEL

    It needs to be done…just do it. The detour will be inconvenient for those of us in Courtland but deal with it. A few extra miles and a few extra minutes. Hey, I have an idea. Let`s put in a temporary bridge and roadway for another $500,000 or more so some lazy folks can`t take a 5 mile detour for the benefit of our local infrastructure. Or let`s wait until it gets shut down or collapses so we have an even longer wait to have a useable bridge.

    Suggest Removal

    • FromHere

      I totally agree DIESEL. We’ve had to “go around” before from floods or repairs. Just do it and get it over with. It really needs to be done.

      Suggest Removal

  • jeffturner

    There is another important road meeting coming up Tuesday night in Ivor on Bell Rd. at 6 pm. The Rt 460 info meeting, a chance to ask is the Rt460 plan still as shady as it was a few months ago since it was born shady and the daddy of it is on trial. learn more about this barf project at the meeting and the complete fleecing of the Virginia taxpayer months ago and still happening by reading t his article.
    http://m.timesdispatch.com/news/state-regional/virginia-politics/mcdonnell-aggressively-pursued-risky-u-s-plan-report-says/article_4b912285-8f6c-509c-9246-87f31aec67a6.html?mode=jqm

    Suggest Removal

  • jeffturner

    Thats a heck of detour.

    Suggest Removal

  • FromHere

    No point in commenting. They’re going to rebuild it anyway. Already moving materials on site.

    Suggest Removal

  • Liberty With Responsibility

    I still say why can’t they put up a pontoon bridge for the temporary use of the people? That is what they did at the Corps of Engineers bridge during renovations of the Great Bridge Bridge in the 70s. What, we are unable to do today what we did in the 1970s? And, even then, Great Bridge had a lot more traffic than Courtland does today.

    Suggest Removal

Editor's Picks