Skip to main content

TIDEWATER

tidewaternews-logo
SUBSCRIBE
Menu
Menu
tidewaternews-logo
Subscribe
Menu

Archives

Trial Set for August 11 in Los Angeles Hospice Fraud Case

Trial Set for August 11 in Los Angeles Hospice Fraud Case

The scheduled federal trial will test prosecutors’ claims that Oren David Shachar directed a widespread Medicare billing operation involving allegedly ineligible patients, deceased beneficiaries, unlawful referral payments, identity misuse, and proceeds spent through a luxury-vehicle transaction. WASHINGTON, DC— An August 11 trial setting in Los Angeles places Oren David Shachar’s hospice fraud prosecution on a path toward jury scrutiny, although later docket orders could still postpone proceedings as lawyers address discovery, evidence, experts, and co-defendant issues. The Justice Department account of the Southern California healthcare fraud cases states that Shachar and alleged co-defendant Abraham Shin were released on bond after June 18 court appearances and were scheduled for trial on August 11. That publicly announced setting creates an important procedural marker, but it does not guarantee that jurors will be selected on that date because federal judges may continue complex criminal trials when preparation, motion practice, protected medical information, or scheduling conflicts require additional time. Shachar, Shin, and Jeannie Choi remain presumed innocent, while every factual assertion describing fraudulent claims, kickbacks, identity misuse, false records, or criminal proceeds remains an allegation that prosecutors must establish beyond a reasonable doubt with admissible and persuasive evidence. A Trial Date Brings the Indictment into Focus The sixteen-count indictment accuses Shachar of leading activity across four Southern California hospice companies from approximately February 2021 through March 2026, while attributing narrower and later periods of alleged participation to Shin and Choi. Prosecutors say the four providers submitted approximately $27.731 million in false Medicare claims and received approximately $26.908 million, but those figures have not been proven at trial and cannot independently establish that any particular defendant possessed criminal intent. The companies identified in the indictment are Gentle Touch Hospice Care in Valley Glen, Oxford Hospice Care in Montclair, Art of Hospice in Encino, and Holly Trinity Hospice in Glendale, each allegedly owned, controlled, or operated by Shachar during relevant periods. If the August 11 setting holds, federal lawyers must translate years of patient files, billing histories, internal communications, corporate records, and financial transactions into a coherent presentation that remains specific to each defendant and each charged count. Defense attorneys will attempt to separate that broad narrative into individual medical judgments, administrative decisions, claim submissions, payments, and communications, arguing, where supported, that the government has confused regulatory problems, employee conduct, or documentation errors with intentional federal crimes. The Conspiracy Charge Establishes the Broadest Theory Count One charges all three defendants with conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud, requiring prosecutors to prove a knowing agreement to pursue the alleged unlawful objective rather than merely demonstrating that the defendants worked together, exchanged information, or participated in hospice operations. The government may rely upon communications, payment records, recurring procedures, shared personnel, patient referrals, record creation, and claim timing to argue that seemingly separate activities reveal coordinated action directed toward obtaining Medicare reimbursements through deception. The defense may respond that professional relationships, referrals, delegated tasks, and repeated business practices can exist without a criminal agreement, especially when physicians, nurses, marketers, billing contractors, administrators, and executives possess different responsibilities and incomplete information. Because conspiracy evidence can gather conduct from several years beneath one overarching theory, the trial judge must ensure that jurors do not treat association, proximity, or evidence concerning one participant as automatic proof against every other defendant. Eight Healthcare Fraud Executions Must Be Proven Individually Counts Two through Nine identify eight specific Medicare claim executions across the four hospices, giving jurors concrete transactions through which prosecutors must establish knowing and willful participation in a scheme involving materially false representations or concealed facts. The first five selected claims, dated between August 2023 and March 2025, name Shachar alone, while the final three claims from September and November 2025 name Shachar, Choi, and Shin together as alleged participants. Individual billed amounts identified for those claims range from approximately $220 to approximately $6,270, demonstrating why the government’s much larger aggregate totals cannot replace claim-level proof regarding eligibility, services, documentation, knowledge, and submission responsibility. Prosecutors may use those selected claims as representative windows into the alleged operation, while defense counsel can challenge whether they accurately reflect broader hospice activity or instead magnify unusual records within thousands of legitimate medical and billing events. Jurors will need to evaluate every substantive count separately, making mixed verdicts legally possible if the evidence proves some transactions beyond a reasonable doubt while leaving meaningful uncertainty concerning other patients, dates, companies, or defendants. Hospice Eligibility Will Be a Central Medical Question Medicare hospice coverage generally depends upon physician certification that a beneficiary is terminally ill, meaning the person’s life expectancy is six months or less if the illness follows its ordinary course, alongside continuing documentation during later benefit periods. Prosecutors allege that Shachar’s companies enrolled and billed for people who were not terminally ill, potentially placing diagnoses, hospital histories, medications, functional assessments, nutritional decline, physician narratives, and later outcomes at the center of expert testimony. The defense can emphasize that prognosis is an informed prediction rather than mathematical certainty, because seriously ill patients sometimes stabilize or survive longer than expected without converting a sincerely reached clinical judgment into knowing fraud. Patient-specific analysis will therefore matter greatly, since generalized evidence that some beneficiaries lived beyond six months, received outside treatment, or showed temporary improvement cannot by itself establish that their original certifications were knowingly false when signed. Prosecution experts may identify copied narratives, unsupported diagnoses, inconsistent assessments, or records disconnected from observed conditions, while defense experts may highlight serious illnesses, fluctuating symptoms, repeated hospitalizations, and reasonable differences among qualified clinicians. Patient Elections Will Test What Beneficiaries Understood Hospice enrollment also requires an election reflecting the beneficiary’s choice of palliative care and understanding of how Medicare coverage changes for treatment connected with the terminal diagnosis, making informed consent records independently important beyond clinical eligibility. The indictment alleges that prospective and enrolled beneficiaries were misled about hospice requirements and the effect enrollment could have upon Medicare payment for curative services, allegations that may be tested through forms, scripts, brochures, messages, translations, and

How a Chiropractor for Car Accident Injuries Supports Recovery

How a Chiropractor for Car Accident Injuries Supports Recovery

Understanding Common Car Accident Injuries Vehicle collisions can affect the body in many different ways. The severity of an injury depends on factors such as the direction of impact, speed of the vehicles, use of seat belts, position of the occupants, and whether the head or body experienced sudden acceleration and deceleration. Whiplash is among the most recognized injuries associated with car accidents. It can affect muscles, ligaments, joints, and other structures around the neck. Symptoms may include neck stiffness, tenderness, headaches, shoulder or upper back discomfort, dizziness, and tingling or numbness in the arms. Some symptoms may not appear immediately following the accident. Lower back pain is another common complaint after collisions. The force of an impact can strain muscles and other supporting tissues. Some individuals may also experience aggravation of an existing spinal condition. Because symptoms can vary considerably, an evaluation is important after an accident, especially if pain, stiffness, weakness, numbness, dizziness, or other unusual symptoms develop. How a Chiropractor for Car Accident Injuries Begins the Recovery Process A chiropractor for car accident injuries typically begins with an assessment rather than immediately providing treatment. The goal is to understand what happened during the collision and determine which areas may have been affected. An evaluation may include questions about the accident, when symptoms began, previous injuries, pain levels, movement limitations, and activities that make symptoms better or worse. A physical examination can assess posture, range of motion, tenderness, muscle function, and other relevant findings. Depending on the situation, additional medical evaluation or imaging may be appropriate. X-rays, CT scans, or MRI scans can be used when healthcare professionals need to rule out fractures or other structural problems. This initial assessment can help establish a more appropriate treatment strategy while identifying situations that require referral to another healthcare professional. Supporting Neck Pain and Whiplash Recovery Neck discomfort is one of the most common concerns following a motor vehicle collision. Whiplash can produce pain and stiffness while making ordinary movements such as turning the head uncomfortable. A chiropractor for car accident injuries may use conservative techniques intended to support mobility and reduce musculoskeletal discomfort. Depending on the patient’s condition, treatment may include gentle manual techniques, mobility exercises, stretching, posture education, and other approaches. The appropriate treatment depends on the severity and type of injury. Chiropractic manipulation is not appropriate for every person or every injury, which is why an individualized assessment is important. Research and clinical guidance on whiplash also emphasize the importance of appropriate movement and rehabilitation. Mayo Clinic notes that exercises can help restore neck range of motion, while physical therapy may help strengthen muscles and improve movement when symptoms persist. Addressing Back Pain After a Collision The lower and middle back can also experience significant stress during an accident. Muscle strains, joint irritation, and changes in movement patterns may contribute to ongoing discomfort. A chiropractic evaluation can look at how the spine and surrounding muscles are functioning after the accident. Treatment may focus on restoring comfortable movement and helping the patient gradually return to normal activities. A recovery plan may also involve therapeutic exercises designed to improve flexibility, strength, stability, and posture. These strategies can be particularly helpful because recovery should not simply focus on reducing pain for a short period. The broader objective is to help restore normal function safely. Why Individualized Treatment Matters Every car accident is different, and every person’s response to an injury is different. Two people involved in the same collision may experience completely different symptoms. One person may primarily experience neck stiffness, while another may have lower back pain, headaches, or shoulder discomfort. Existing conditions can also influence recovery. For this reason, a chiropractor for car accident injuries should develop care around the individual’s symptoms and functional limitations rather than applying the same approach to every patient. Treatment may also change as recovery progresses. Early care may focus on managing discomfort and restoring gentle movement. Later stages may place greater emphasis on strengthening, flexibility, posture, and returning to normal activities. The Importance of Monitoring Symptoms Some accident-related symptoms may take time to develop. Cleveland Clinic notes that certain whiplash symptoms can appear hours or even days after an injury. This is one reason people should pay attention to changes in their condition after a collision. Increasing pain, new numbness, weakness, severe headaches, dizziness, or other concerning symptoms should not simply be ignored. A chiropractor can monitor musculoskeletal symptoms during treatment, but chiropractic care does not replace emergency or medical care when serious injury is suspected. For example, symptoms associated with a possible concussion require appropriate medical attention. A person does not necessarily have to lose consciousness to experience a concussion, so unusual symptoms following a head impact or forceful movement of the head should be evaluated appropriately. Learn how Chiropractic of Naples helps after a crash. Learn how Chiropractic of Naples helps after a crash. Following an accident, having access to professional guidance can make it easier to understand your symptoms and determine what steps may support recovery. For patients in Southwest Florida, working with a Chiropractor Naples provider may offer a convenient option for evaluating musculoskeletal concerns following a collision. A local chiropractic professional can assess movement, identify areas of discomfort, and recommend an individualized approach when chiropractic treatment is appropriate. It is important to remember that chiropractic care can be one component of a broader recovery strategy. Depending on the injury, patients may also need care from physicians, physical therapists, orthopedic specialists, or other healthcare professionals. Combining Chiropractic Care With Active Rehabilitation Recovery from a car accident is often more than simply reducing pain. Restoring normal movement and function can be equally important. Mayo Clinic recommends appropriate activity and exercises for many people recovering from whiplash, with treatment goals that include controlling pain, restoring range of motion, and returning to regular activities. A chiropractor for car accident injuries may incorporate movement and exercise recommendations into a treatment plan when appropriate. These exercises can help patients gradually regain confidence

How A Realtor In Cincinnati Ohio Helps With Offer Strategy

How a Realtor in Cincinnati Ohio Helps With Offer Strategy

Navigating the real estate market across Greater Cincinnati from vibrant urban communities like Over-the-Rhine and Hyde Park to sought-after northern suburbs like Mason, Deerfield Township, and West Chester requires far more than simply finding a property you love online. Once you locate an ideal home, the most crucial phase of the home buying journey begins: formulating and submitting a winning purchase offer. In a dynamic regional market, submitting a successful offer is rarely just a matter of offering the highest purchase price. Sellers evaluate contract proposals based on holistic terms, including financing strength, earnest money deposits, inspection windows, appraisal contingency structures, and flexible closing dates. Crafting a compelling purchase agreement without overpaying demands technical market insight and tactical negotiation experience. A realtor helps Cincinnati buyers submit competitive offers without overextending their budget. Here is a detailed breakdown of how partnering with a dedicated local real estate expert optimizes your offer strategy to secure your dream home on favorable financial terms. 1. Establishing True Market Value via Comparative Market Analysis (CMA) Before deciding on an initial offer price, you must understand a property’s true market value rather than relying on the seller’s asking price or automated online valuation estimates. [ Raw List Price ] ──► Comparative Market Analysis (CMA) Audit ──► Data-Backed Base Offer Target An experienced Realtor in Cincinnati Ohio conducts an in-depth Comparative Market Analysis (CMA) by reviewing recent sales data across immediate neighborhood micro-markets: Recent Closed Sales: Analyzing properties with similar square footage, age, and layout that closed within the last 30 to 90 days. Pending Sales Signals: Gathering intelligence on active listings that went under contract rapidly to gauge immediate local buyer demand. Property Condition Adjustments: Factor in recent renovations, roof conditions, HVAC ages, and necessary cosmetic updates against neighborhood standards.     2. Navigating Multiple-Offer Scenarios and Escalation Clauses In high-demand sub-markets like Mason and Hyde Park, desirable properties frequently attract multiple competitive bids within days of hitting the market. Winning a bidding war without exposing yourself to severe financial risk requires strategic offer structuring. ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ STRATEGIC OFFER STRUCTURE COMPARISON │ ├──────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Basic Purchase Proposal │ Agent-Optimized Strategic Offer │ ├──────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Rigid static price bid │ Dynamic Escalation Clause (bids incrementally│ │ without competitive buffers. │ higher than competing offers up to a cap). │ ├──────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Standard pre-qualification │ Fully underwritten pre-approval letter backed│ │ letter from an online lender.│ by a reputable local mortgage lender. │ ├──────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Fixed, inflexible closing │ Flexible possession terms tailored directly │ │ and occupancy timelines. │ to match the seller’s ideal transition date. │ └──────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────────────┘ By utilizing escalation clauses, your agent ensures that your bid automatically increases above competing offers by specified increments while remaining securely locked under your maximum budget ceiling. 3. Balancing Inspection Contingencies and Risk Mitigation While some buyers feel tempted to waive home inspections entirely to make their offer more attractive to sellers, doing so exposes you to catastrophic financial liabilities if major structural, foundation, or roof defects exist. [ Purchase Contract ] ──► Optimized Inspection Window ──► Protection Against Structural Liabilities Smart Inspection Contingency Strategies: Shortened Inspection Windows: Reducing the inspection contingency timeline from the standard 10 days down to 3–5 days signals commitment to the seller without waiving your right to inspect. Major Defect Threshold Clauses: Including contractual language specifying that you will only request repairs or credits for major mechanical, health, or structural issues exceeding a specific dollar amount (e.g., $2,000+). Pre-Offer Inspections: In hyper-competitive situations, arranging a rapid walk-through inspection with a trusted contractor prior to submitting the formal offer.     4. Managing Appraisal Contingencies and Appraisal Gaps When financing a home through a mortgage lender, an official appraisal is required to confirm that the property’s value meets or exceeds the agreed purchase price. In rapidly appreciating markets, high purchase prices can lead to appraisal shortfalls. Scenario Risk Profile Strategic Agent Solution Full Appraisal Waiver High out-of-pocket financial risk. Only recommended when cash liquid reserves are verified and abundant. Partial Appraisal Gap Coverage Managed, predictable expense limit. Agreement to cover shortfalls up to a capped amount (e.g., $5,000 max). Standard Appraisal Contingency Low risk for buyer; higher risk for seller. Retains complete contract cancellation rights if appraisal comes in low. Your Realtor helps you structure partial appraisal gap guarantees that reassure the seller while keeping your cash commitment firmly bounded. 5. Communicating Directly with the Listing Agent Beyond numbers on paper, real estate transactions are fundamentally human interactions. An experienced buyer’s agent communicates directly with the listing agent prior to drafting the purchase agreement to discover what terms matter most to the seller. Whether the seller requires a quick 20-day closing, a post-closing occupancy agreement (rent-back) while their new home is built, or specific earnest money terms, aligning your contract with the seller’s personal priorities gives your bid a major competitive edge. Conclusion Formulating an effective offer strategy is a delicate balance of competitive pricing, protective legal contingencies, and strategic negotiation. By partnering with a knowledgeable local Realtor who understands Greater Cincinnati’s distinct sub-markets, you can submit confident, winning offers that secure your ideal home while safeguarding your financial well-being. Ready to navigate the Cincinnati housing market with a proven strategy? Connect with the real estate team at The Schafers Group to schedule your home buying consultation today. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Q: What is an escalation clause in an Ohio real estate offer? A: An escalation clause is a contract addendum stating that you are willing to increase your offer price by a set increment (e.g., $2,000) above any higher competing offer, up to a specified maximum price cap. Q: How much earnest money should I include with my offer in Cincinnati? A: Earnest money deposits typically range from 1% to 3% of the total purchase price. Offering a higher earnest money deposit demonstrates financial strength and serious commitment to the seller. Q: Should I waive my home inspection contingency to win a competitive house? A: Completely waiving a home inspection is rarely

Share buybacks in Ericsson during the period August 3 – August 7, 2026

STOCKHOLM, Aug. 10, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — During the period August 3 – August 7, 2026, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (“Ericsson”) (LEI code 549300W9JLPW15XIFM52) repurchased own Class B shares (ISIN: SE0000108656) as follows: Date Aggregated daily volume (number of shares)Weighted average…

ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. Announces Monthly Net Revenues*

TAIPEI, Aug. 10, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (NYSE: ASX, TAIEX: 3711, “ASEH” or the “Company”), announces its unaudited consolidated net revenues for July 2026. CONSOLIDATED NET REVENUES (UNAUDITED)JulJunJulSequentialYoY(NT$ Million)202620262025ChangeChangeNet Revenues73,78465,78351,542+12.2 %+43.2 %JulJunJulSequentialYoY(US$ Million)202620262025ChangeChangeNet Revenues2,3092,0921,769+10.4 %+30.6 %Net revenues for…

Federal Indictment Charges Oren Shachar in Southern California Hospice Fraud, Identity Theft and Kickback Scheme

Federal Indictment Charges Oren Shachar in Southern California Hospice Fraud, Identity Theft and Kickback Scheme

The 16-count federal case accuses the Van Nuys hospice owner and two alleged associates of conspiracy, health care fraud, aggravated identity theft, unlawful referral payments, trafficking in Medicare identifiers, and spending proceeds connected to fraudulent reimbursement claims WASHINGTON, DC — A federal grand jury indictment charging Oren David Shachar has placed an alleged Southern California hospice operation at the intersection of Medicare fraud, beneficiary exploitation, identity misuse, prohibited referral compensation, and financial concealment. Prosecutors allege that Shachar controlled four hospice businesses whose claims totaled approximately $27,731,000, while Medicare allegedly paid approximately $26,908,000 for services characterized as medically unnecessary, ineligible, misrepresented, unprovided, or secured through illegal kickbacks and bribes. The 16-count case also charges Jeannie Choi and Abraham Shin, whom prosecutors describe as marketers involved during 2025, although the allegations against each person differ substantially by count, time period, transaction, and asserted role. Every charge remains an accusation rather than a finding of guilt, and Shachar, Choi, and Shin retain the presumption of innocence unless prosecutors prove every required element through admissible evidence beyond a reasonable doubt in federal court. Sixteen counts create a detailed charging architecture The Justice Department’s official 23-page federal indictment divides the prosecution into one conspiracy count, eight health care fraud counts, three aggravated identity theft counts, one financial-transaction count, two kickback-payment counts, and one identifier-sale count. That structure matters because a jury could reach different conclusions across the indictment, accepting evidence supporting one alleged payment or claim while rejecting another theory involving medical eligibility, stolen information, corporate responsibility, or proceeds tracing. The charging document also contains three forfeiture allegations that could become relevant only after a qualifying conviction, separating the government’s effort to establish criminal liability from its later attempt to recover proceeds or property connected to proven offenses. Count One alleges a five-year conspiracy Count One alleges that Shachar knowingly conspired with known and unknown participants from no later than February 2021 through at least March 2026 to execute a scheme defrauding Medicare through hospice claims and related conduct. The indictment places Shin’s alleged entry no later than March 2025, while Choi’s asserted participation began no later than May 2025 and continued through at least November 2025, creating materially different periods of alleged involvement. To establish conspiracy, prosecutors must prove knowing agreement rather than mere association, employment, communication, or participation in lawful hospice activity, while each defendant may challenge whether the evidence demonstrates awareness of and voluntary participation in an unlawful objective. Four hospice companies anchor the corporate allegations Prosecutors identify Gentle Touch Hospice Care in Valley Glen, Oxford Hospice Care in Montclair, Art of Hospice in Encino, and Holly Trinity Hospice in Glendale as the four businesses allegedly owned, controlled, or operated by Shachar. The entities entered the government’s chronology at different times, which means corporate filings, Medicare enrollment records, bank authority, payroll information, purchase agreements, office communications, and employee testimony may become essential to establishing actual control during disputed periods. Ownership alone would not prove knowledge of every admission, certification, chart entry, referral, or electronic claim, so prosecutors must connect organizational records with evidence showing how Shachar allegedly directed, authorized, understood, or benefited from the charged conduct. Medicare hospice rules supply the case’s legal foundation Medicare generally treats a beneficiary as terminally ill for hospice purposes when the individual’s life expectancy is six months or less if the illness follows its normal course, together with appropriate physician certification and an informed hospice election. Hospice services focus upon palliation and comfort, including nursing, symptom-management medication, equipment, counseling, therapies, and family support, while the election affects Medicare coverage for treatment intended to cure the illness underlying the terminal prognosis. Because medical prognosis involves professional judgment rather than mathematical certainty, survival beyond six months does not independently establish fraud, although prosecutors may prove criminal falsity through fabricated records, nonexistent examinations, knowingly unsupported certifications, or deliberate concealment of material facts. Enrollment forms could help prosecutors address knowledge The indictment alleges that Shachar submitted at least 11 Medicare enrollment applications certifying that his hospices would bill only for medically necessary services provided as represented and would not base claims upon illegal kickbacks or bribes. Prosecutors may use those certifications to argue that Shachar understood the conditions governing reimbursement before the challenged claims were submitted, particularly if other communications or payment records demonstrate conduct inconsistent with the representations he allegedly signed. Defense counsel can respond that standardized enrollment language proves awareness of general rules rather than knowledge of particular clinical errors, employee misconduct, marketer activity, or inaccurate entries created later within decentralized hospice operations serving multiple beneficiaries. Counts Two through Nine identify eight alleged fraud executions The eight substantive health care fraud counts identify particular dates, hospice companies, abbreviated beneficiary names, claim numbers, billed amounts, and defendants, transforming the indictment’s broad narrative into transactions prosecutors must establish individually through reliable evidence. Counts Two through Six name Shachar alone and concern claims dated between August 2023 and March 2025, while Counts Seven through Nine name Shachar, Choi, and Shin and concern three later claims submitted during 2025. The listed claim amounts range from approximately $220 to $6,270, demonstrating that the substantive counts function as selected executions of the alleged scheme rather than a transaction-by-transaction accounting of the entire headline loss calculation. The $27.7 million total does not decide the selected counts Prosecutors allege that the four hospices submitted approximately $27.731 million and received approximately $26.908 million, but those aggregate figures cannot replace proof that each charged execution involved materially false representations, knowing conduct, and a federal health care benefit program. Claims analysts may explain how investigators classified the larger universe of reimbursements, while defense experts can examine whether government calculations included legitimate patients, compensable services, coding corrections, clinical disputes, or payments disconnected from the charged conduct. Jurors must therefore distinguish evidence offered to describe scope from evidence proving liability, because a large aggregate can convey seriousness and pattern without demonstrating that every included claim was fraudulent or attributable to a particular defendant. Living beneficiaries form the first alleged patient